If you've ever explored hiring help for your Meta Ads, you've probably come across the concept of a "media buyer"—a specialist who manages ad buying on your behalf.
The pitch is compelling: hand over your advertising to an expert, focus on your business, and watch the customers roll in. Many agencies and freelancers charge $1,500-5,000+ per month for this service.
But here's what they don't tell you: the media buyer role was designed for a different era of advertising, and most small businesses don't actually need one.
What Media Buyers Actually Do
The traditional media buyer role emerged from broadcast advertising—TV, radio, print. In that world, buying media was genuinely complex:
- Negotiating rates with media outlets
- Managing insertion orders and deadlines
- Understanding audience demographics for each channel
- Coordinating creative delivery to multiple publishers
- Tracking performance across disparate systems
This required specialized skills and relationships. You couldn't just "do it yourself."
Digital media buying inherited this model. Early Google and Facebook ads were still complex enough that specialists added real value. Targeting was manual. Optimization was manual. Reporting required spreadsheet wizardry.
What Changed
Meta's advertising platform in 2025 is fundamentally different from what it was even five years ago. Three shifts have reduced the need for specialized media buyers:
1. The algorithm does the targeting
Meta's machine learning now handles most of what media buyers used to do manually. Audience targeting, bid optimization, placement selection—the algorithm does this automatically, and often better than humans.
The old skill of "knowing which audiences to target" is largely obsolete. Broad targeting with strong creative often outperforms carefully constructed audience segments.
2. Campaign structures have simplified
Best practices have shifted toward fewer, broader campaigns. Instead of managing 50 ad sets with intricate targeting, the recommended approach is 2-3 campaigns with fewer restrictions.
Less structure means less to manage. The "complexity advantage" that media buyers offered has shrunk.
3. Tools have caught up
Modern ad management tools surface insights that used to require hours of analysis. Clear verdicts (Scale, Watch, Kill), automated alerts, and intuitive dashboards mean business owners can make informed decisions without deep expertise.
What You're Really Paying For
When you hire a media buyer or agency, what are you actually getting?
Time savings
The biggest value is someone else managing the day-to-day. But day-to-day management of modern campaigns takes 30-60 minutes per week, not hours per day. Is that worth $2,000/month?
Platform familiarity
Media buyers know where the buttons are in Ads Manager. That's nice, but it's not rocket science. You can learn the interface. And modern tools often bypass Ads Manager entirely.
Testing and optimization
Good media buyers continuously test and improve campaigns. But again—this is increasingly algorithmic. And you know your business better than any outside buyer ever will.
Experience with what works
Experienced buyers have seen what works across many accounts. This is genuinely valuable—but much of this knowledge is now codified in best practices and embedded in tools.
The Math Doesn't Work (At Small Budgets)
Here's the uncomfortable truth: for most small businesses, the math on hiring help doesn't add up.
Say you're spending $2,000/month on ads. A media buyer charges $1,500/month. Now your total marketing cost is $3,500/month.
For that $1,500/month to be worth it, the media buyer needs to generate at least $1,500 in additional value—either through better performance or time savings worth that much to you.
Can a media buyer improve your results by 75%? Sometimes, yes. But often the improvement is marginal—maybe 10-20%—because the algorithm handles most of the optimization anyway.
The Break-Even Point
- $1,000/mo spend: A $1,500 media buyer fee means 150% overhead. Almost never worth it.
- $5,000/mo spend: $1,500 fee = 30% overhead. Only worth it if performance improves significantly.
- $20,000/mo spend: $1,500 fee = 7.5% overhead. Now it makes more sense.
- $50,000/mo spend: Specialized help is almost always justified.
The threshold where hiring help makes financial sense is higher than most people think—typically $10,000-20,000+ monthly ad spend.
The Hidden Downside of Outsourcing
Beyond cost, there are other reasons to think twice about hiring out your ad management:
You never learn
If someone else manages your ads, you don't build the muscle. You're dependent forever. When the relationship ends, you're back to square one.
Context gets lost
You know your business intimately. A media buyer knows it from a brief and monthly calls. They miss nuances that affect performance: that product is about to sell out, that testimonial is from your best customer, that neighborhood is your sweet spot.
Misaligned incentives
Many agencies are incentivized to spend your money (they make more when you spend more) or to make things seem complicated (justifies their fees). Your incentive is profitability. These don't always align.
Communication overhead
Explaining what you want, reviewing reports, approving changes, providing feedback—all of this takes time. Sometimes more time than just doing it yourself.
What Small Businesses Should Do Instead
If you're spending less than $10,000/month on ads, here's a better approach than hiring a media buyer:
1. Use tools that simplify management
Modern ad management platforms reduce the time and expertise required. Clear dashboards, automatic alerts, one-click actions—these replace much of what you'd pay a media buyer for.
2. Learn the fundamentals
You don't need to become an expert, but understanding the basics makes you a better decision-maker. Know your key metrics (ROAS, CPA, CTR). Understand campaign structure. Learn what "good" looks like for your business.
3. Start simple and iterate
You don't need complex campaigns. One traffic campaign, one retargeting campaign—that's often enough to start. Add complexity as you learn what works.
4. Focus on creative (not technical optimization)
Creative is the biggest lever in Meta Ads. Your time is better spent making compelling ads than tweaking targeting settings. The algorithm handles targeting; you handle the message.
5. Set aside regular time
30 minutes twice a week is enough to manage a small ad account effectively. Put it on your calendar like any other business task.
Signs You Might Actually Need Help
That said, there are situations where outside help makes sense:
Significant scale
Once you're spending $10,000+/month, optimization improvements compound meaningfully. A 10% improvement on $20,000/month is $2,000—enough to justify professional help.
Rapid growth
If you're scaling quickly and ads are a core growth channel, specialized attention can accelerate results and prevent costly mistakes.
Zero time
If you genuinely cannot spare 30-60 minutes per week, outsourcing might be necessary. But be honest: most people can find this time.
Specialized expertise needed
Some situations genuinely require expertise: complex attribution setups, multi-market strategies, catalog-based advertising at scale. If your needs are specialized, specialized help makes sense.
You've plateaued
If you've been managing your own ads and performance has flatlined despite your efforts, fresh eyes can help identify what you're missing.
The Middle Ground: Consulting
If you want expert input without full-time management costs, consider consulting:
- Strategy sessions: Pay for a few hours with an expert to audit your account and provide recommendations. You implement; they advise.
- Creative review: Get feedback on your ads from someone who's seen thousands. Often the fastest way to improve performance.
- Setup help: Have someone configure your pixel, set up attribution, structure your first campaigns. Then take over.
This gives you expert knowledge without ongoing fees. You maintain control, build skills, and pay only for what you need.
The Future of Media Buying
The media buyer role isn't disappearing, but it's changing. The tactical work—button clicking, bid adjustments, audience testing—is increasingly automated. What remains valuable is strategic: understanding brand positioning, creative direction, full-funnel thinking.
For small businesses, this means:
- Tactical media buying is not worth paying for at small scale
- Strategic marketing guidance may be valuable (when you're ready)
- Tools that automate tactical work are the smart investment
How to Evaluate If You Need Help
Honest self-assessment time:
You probably don't need a media buyer if:
- You're spending less than $5,000/month
- You can dedicate 1-2 hours weekly to ads
- Your campaigns are relatively straightforward
- You're willing to learn the basics
- You want to understand your own marketing
You might need help if:
- You're spending $10,000+/month
- You have zero time available
- Your campaigns are complex (catalog, multi-market, etc.)
- Performance has stalled despite your efforts
- Ads are critical to growth and you need to move fast
The Bottom Line
The media buyer role was created for a world where advertising required specialized skills and relationships. Digital advertising has democratized—the tools are accessible, the platforms are smarter, and the heavy lifting is automated.
For most small businesses spending under $10,000/month, hiring a media buyer doesn't make economic sense. You're paying a premium for work that modern tools and algorithms can largely handle.
Instead, invest in:
- Tools that simplify management
- Your own foundational knowledge
- Great creative
- Consistent time and attention
You don't need an expert to manage your ads. You need to understand your business, make compelling creative, and use tools that surface clear decisions. The algorithm handles the rest.
Manage your own ads with confidence
KillScale gives you the same insights media buyers use—instant verdicts, automated alerts, one-click actions—without the $2,000/month retainer. Built for business owners, not agencies.
Start Free — No Credit Card Required